I have made many arguments some of which cover what you described as well-you just repeated them with a new example, which I appreciate because it could work as an example of subtle innovation within the essay
. I specifically stated I don’t want to advocate for experimentation for everyone other than myself and they should on their own decide the degree required by the work. I champion form + content as one whole. My “framework” leaves plenty of room for different types of innovation. And I never said everyone should do “textual acrobatics” (my favourite writer is Chekhov).
What an extraordinary piece, inspiring and illuminating. You have helped me find an even deeper appreciation for fiction. Thank you for writing this.
most obliged, sir
You can't beat a cliche done well. The novel might have started it's core in going back to the heart. Do the obvious, better.
I have made many arguments some of which cover what you described as well-you just repeated them with a new example, which I appreciate because it could work as an example of subtle innovation within the essay
. I specifically stated I don’t want to advocate for experimentation for everyone other than myself and they should on their own decide the degree required by the work. I champion form + content as one whole. My “framework” leaves plenty of room for different types of innovation. And I never said everyone should do “textual acrobatics” (my favourite writer is Chekhov).